Finally good scientific reasoning and common sense have prevailed and Pluto has been officially demoted from planet status. As you can tell I am pleased with the IAU's decision, and that the ‘fact’ that the public think it should be a planet—because that's what they grew up learning—is patently absurd. Firstly, most of the public couldn't give two monkeys, and secondly, those members of the public who are aware of Pluto's small size, the Kuiper Belt, the other TNOs, and the body's inclination and eccentricity, yet still want to call it a planet, appear to only want to do so for historical reasons.
Having said that, I do disagree with the wording of the definition of ‘Planet’ that they adopted, specifically clause (c) which stipulates that a body must have “cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit”, which is clearly not the case for the other eight planets, who all co-orbit with many other (though much smaller) bodies. Also, clause (a) which states that a planet must orbit “the Sun” rather than a star. Technically this means that extra-solar planets don't count either. This wording should be cleaned up to correct for these flaws.